For this post I decided to compare two real estate giants, Trulia and Zillow, on their social media engagement. With all the action in real estate happening online and the buzz about social media getting louder everyday, I wanted to see how well these two industry pillars were taking advantage of the opportunity.
Our comparison starts with a look at each company’s Facebook fan page where we will examine how well they engage visitors at the front door and then will look at both companies from an engagement point of view. The idea here is that these two big brands can show us a thing or two about how to do real estate social media right. We’ll start our tour by looking at Trulia’s Facebook fan page.

The first thing I noticed is that the entry page is the “wall”, which is surprisingly underwhelming. For a company with this much visibility, we would have expected something a little more engaging.
The side bar menu doesn’t offer a visitor much more. When I clicked on the most interesting thing there, Sweepstakes, I get a message that informs me “No promotions published”. Really!
The photo bar shows pictures of nice homes, which I would expect to find on the Trulia fan pages, but when I try to find other pictures of homes, there are few to be found. Not what I’m expecting from one of the leading real estate marketing companies.
They also offer an email sign up link in the side bar menu, but based on what I’ve seen so far, why would I have any interest in receiving an email. Worse yet, the landing page for the email sign up is anything but compelling.
Come on guys, I have a lot of respect for your brand, is this the best you can do? Either no one in marketing knows this page exists or the Trulia marketing team needs some training in Facebook landing page best practices.
All in all, my “front door” experience on the Trulia Facebook page left me wanting something more. If I didn’t already know who Trulia was, I’d probably bail on this page about now.
Now lets take a look at one of the other real estate industry giants, Zillow.
Good news and bad news greets us on the Zillow Facebook fan page. The good news is that at least they know how to land a visitor somewhere other than their “Wall” page. The bad news is we are greeted with this message;
Now, while we have to applaud the Zillow social media team for coming up with a contest on their Facebook entry page. The idea of having people upload their photo and share it with their friends to get them to visit the Zillow fan page to vote on it is border line brilliant. As an added incentive, Zillow was offering $1,000 and $500 Home Depot gift cards to the winners. Again, great example of a social media marketing campaign.
So with all the apparent marketing genius at the front end of this event, we have to ask why they would leave this page up so long after the contest ended. Sure you can click on the link to see the winning entries but was this really the only Facebook marketing idea they could come up with for 2011?
The call-to-action “like Zillow to enter!” seriously loses its allure when the contest is over and I can simply click on the “wall” link at left to enter anyway.
With regards to their side menu bar, Zillow does show some social media intelligence. The Discussions and Poll options are a great way to get people to stay on your site and get engaged.
Having a Twitter and Facebook link open into their Facebook fan page is also a great way to get people to stick around, learn more about you and interact. More often than not, I see companies link out to their Twitter, YouTube or other pages. I’ve never been a big fan of giving a visitor to my site or page an easy way to leave and I’m happy to see that Zillow gets this.
Other than the disappointing entry page, which when it was current, was a great idea, I’d say the Zillow social media marketing team has their head in the game more than their friends at Trulia
Now let’s take a look at the level of social engagement each brand exhibits on Facebook as measured by a cool tool I recently came across, Simply Measured.
The first metric we will compare our two real estate brands on is Total Fans;
This is a simple comparison of the number of fans each brand has. As you can see, Zillow has more fans than Trulia, but this post is about fan engagement so this metric in and of itself is not very telling.
Every great social media marketer could come up with a number of ways to get people to click on the like button. How we engage them after they become fans, followers or connections is a more accurate measure of social media effectiveness.
Next we’ll look at Total Engagement;
This data point is a little more telling as it shows us which brand has more fan engagement from both a total number of interactions (Posts, Comments and Likes) and percent of fans. From this graph we can see that Trulia, which has a smaller number of fans, has more fans engaged with their brand on Facebook.
While this graph is considerably more informative than the previous one, it’s also only part of the puzzle, and it would be too early to tell which brand wins our real estate social media smack down.
The third graph we’ll compare these two brands on measures Fan Page Engagement Detail and allows us to see the type of engagement that makes up the numbers in the graph above;
Things start to get a little more interesting in this graph as we see, more specifically, how the fans of each real estate marketing brand actually engage with the brand.
While Trulia’s total engagement number is higher, according to this graph, the majority of their fan engagement comes from “likes”, which for a well know brand like these two, is the low hanging fruit.
Zillow’s detail on the other hand, is more heavily weighted by fan comments, which require more of an effort, and also includes fan posts. Clearly Zillow’s fan engagement is much less dependent on “likes”.
As I mention above, comments and posts show a higher level of engagement than “likes”. If we were only to look at this graph for our comparison, we could go out on a limb and say that Zillow is doing a better job of social engagement. They are posting things that their fans are compelled to comment on and their fans feel their is value in posting on their fan page, otherwise they wouldn’t be doing it.
Finally, we will compare Zillow and Trulia based on Average Response Per Post:
On this final chart we see that both Zillow and Trulia average 13 likes per post on their Facebook fan page. However, Zillow sees an average of 25 comments per post compared to Trulia’s 9. The bottom line is that Zillow’s posts, which is on the brand side of the equation, are driving more fan engagement.
When you couple this with the fact that Zillow has a more compelling mix of response types ( see Engagement Details above) it looks to me like we have a clear winner in our real estate social media smack down.
Congratulations Zillow, you win!
Before anyone gets too excited I need to point out a few facts about the data I used for this comparison. First, the numbers and graphs above were based on a two week snap shot from September 26th to November 10th. Second, social media is dynamic and anything can happen week to week to tip the scale. If either one of these brands launches a creative Facebook marketing campaign next week, the results could change substantially.
But the bottom line is that in order to be truly effective in social media, brands like these two real estate leaders need to establish a social media marketing plan. This plan needs to include content curation, content creation and delivery, listening, monitoring and responding and finally measuring.
Two weeks is but a sprint. I wonder what the results will look like one year from now? Stay tuned!
You may also enjoy;


















